Speaking Generally - all content crown copy 09

What is programming, and also conversely to this, what indeed is free thought?   Put another way then, at what point does programming end, and free thought begin?    Perhaps verbal language might be considered as merely a  window dressing for total communication?  After all, had it not been for language, something, in all probability telepathy, would surely by now have occupied its space.

Telepathy would transform communication as peacocks feathers to our existing lame shades of grey, and only then, and freed from the hideous constraints of verbal language, would our specie for the first time actually communicate first hand thought.  How often can it be said that even in our currently most complex song do we/can we communicate to everyone as though just one?. Free thinking is actually impossible as humans to define because it is simply too mixed up with our programmed human condition.

Males are also programmed to think, to a greater, or, to a lesser extent, in exactly the same kind of way, though it isn`t of course actually thought, for programming is programming, and thinking is thinking.  The amount of actual thinking is comparatively slight, generally superficial, and likely largely programmed thinking at best. That this is social conditioning, (of both sexes, beginning at an early age, and most relevant during females primary years), and therefore a part of the human condition is most likely the main reason for there having been so little written here, though it could quite easily fill books.  It is most certainly a significant part of what we are as humans, or rather, what we have allowed ourselves to be.
It`s very possible that only those males, likely very few, that are genetically predisposed to young females ( as opposed to it merely being a preference) are freely able to function entirely independently of this social programming here, and therefore must be in constant disbelief.  It seems that without predisposition, all-be-it in widely varying degrees, that there actually might only be programming?

There are numerous groupings, and then sub-groupings, of older males (those falling beyond the cut-off) Some only prefer the company of much younger females, but are able to make do with what they get. There is another group, one to which I belong, that has total incapacity for real depth of friendship (and ultimately genuine love) for females other than those much younger, not in any way out of selfishness, but purely predisposition. It could be that some of us in my group are driven to suicide at one extreme, and to hatred at the other, as a final consequence of this almost inexplicable, yet relentless rejection. It would perhaps be made easier by having someone to blame, but there never is. These then are the two main groups.
For some it is sexual, either as a preference, or a predisposition (in the same way heterosexuality can be said to be a predisposition) for others it`s fundamentally about age specific chemistry and personality. It could be that many in this group are very young of personality themselves, and perhaps actually tend to have much more in common with younger people generally. This may also be a predisposition, and like is drawn to like. Tougher still for those predisposed, like drawn to like, (other than only the number of years since birth, which is not anyway a characteristic) on every single level. copyright 09 kates

When friendships such as these are intercepted at the point of going active/doing things together, there is generally no coming back. The friendship is more often ended apart rather than when together, for when together there may only exist perfection. In the unlikely event that things should become active, then the friendship, in its most absolute sense, is ended in that moment that the mans age is realised. The friendships at there very best tend to be dismantling of programming for only a brief time.
It is likely, though probably quite difficult to demonstrate, that many male suicides are provoked, at least in part, by this totally ruthless treatment of friendships, where the male is beyond the cut- off age. Beyond the almost inevitable denial, the loss to the female may be felt with the same gravity.
For many females the cut off age for their friendships seems to be set precisely the same as for their relationships, usually their age plus anywhere up to twelve years. I had over looked this group until now, but my more recent research is beginning to suggest, however alarming, that this group may actually make up the majority of young women. What I`m also learning is that words may be almost meaningless in my attempts of gathering information here, and quite possibly regarding the subject of relationships generally. If the cut off age for friendship is indeed the same as for `relationships`, that would seem to suggest to me that many young women may have incapacity for any great depth of friendship, in the absence of a `relationship`, with males of any age? Half baked friendships aside, they may fair little if any better in the friendship stakes than their male counterparts. No wonder then that they`ll almost invariably misconstrue any real depth of friendship at all, if it also turns out to be an issue as powerful as gender itself, and then put back to back with age discrimatory programming.